Mr Pothole's Guide: How to Beat a Highways Authority in the Small Claims Court

The Authority Has to Prove Its Defence

 

Section 58 isn't a "get out of jail free" card. The authority must prove it took reasonable care to inspect and maintain the highway.

If it can't, the court can find in your favour.

The key is exposing weaknesses in the authority's maintenance regime.

 

Build Your Case Like an Investigator

​

The strongest cases are built on facts, not emotion.

Gather:

• Clear photographs of the pothole before it is repaired.

• Measurements of its depth, width and length.

• The precise location using GPS or What3Words.

• Dashcam footage if available.

• Witness statements.

• Photographs of the damage to your vehicle.

• Repair invoices, recovery costs and any other financial losses.

 

Don't Overlook Google Street View and Online Reporting Systems

 

One of the most overlooked sources of evidence is Google Street View. Using a PC or laptop, search for the exact location and switch to Street View. Where historical imagery is available, you can often view previous images taken over several years. The imagery includes a date stamp (typically showing the month and year the image was captured), which can help establish whether the pothole, failed repair or deteriorating road surface was already present before your incident. This can provide valuable evidence that a defect had existed for a significant period before the highways authority took action.

It is also worth checking online reporting platforms such as FixMyStreet. Search the location to see whether other road users had already reported the same pothole or defect. Previous reports, particularly those made weeks or months before your incident, may help demonstrate that the highways authority had prior knowledge of the problem or should reasonably have been aware of it. This can be extremely useful when challenging a Section 58 defence and showing that the defect was not simply a recent occurrence.

Remember to save screenshots of the Street View imagery, including the image date, and any relevant FixMyStreet reports. Together with inspection records, photographs and repair history, these can form a powerful body of evidence when presenting your case to the Small Claims Court.

The more evidence you collect, the stronger your case becomes.

​

The Documents They Don't Want You to See

​

The most valuable evidence often comes from the highways authority itself.

Request copies of:

• Highway inspection records.

• Safety inspection reports.

• Previous complaints about the defect.

• Previous repair records.

• The authority's inspection policy.

• Intervention criteria.

• Risk assessments.

• Dates when the defect was first reported.

These documents often reveal whether the authority followed its own procedures—or failed to do so.

 

Questions to Ask

 

When you receive the records, ask yourself:

• Was the pothole already above the intervention level?

• Did inspectors miss an obvious defect?

• Had the pothole already been reported?

• Were previous repairs simply temporary patches?

• Did the authority miss its own repair deadlines?

• Were inspections carried out when they should have been?

If the answer to any of these questions is "yes", the authority's Section 58 defence may begin to fall apart.

 

Before You Issue Court Proceedings

 

Don't rush into court.

First:

• Submit your compensation claim.

• Read the rejection carefully.

• Obtain the inspection and maintenance records.

• Send a formal Letter Before Claim.

• Give the authority one final opportunity to settle.

Many claims are resolved before a hearing when authorities realise their records won't withstand scrutiny.

 

The Bigger Picture

 

This isn't just about recovering the cost of a damaged tyre or alloy wheel.

It's about accountability.

Britain's local road maintenance backlog now exceeds £18.6 billion, and temporary pothole repairs continue to fail at an alarming rate. Too often, authorities rely on short-term fixes while road conditions deteriorate.

When motorists challenge poor maintenance through the courts, they don't just seek compensation—they shine a light on inadequate inspection regimes, poor repair standards and chronic underinvestment.

 

Mr Pothole's Verdict

 

Don't be intimidated by legal jargon or rejection letters.

If you've got the evidence, ask the difficult questions, obtain the maintenance records and challenge the authority's defence.

Many motorists lose because they accept the first "no."

The Small Claims Court exists to ensure public bodies are held accountable. If a highways authority has failed in its duty to maintain the highway, don't be afraid to let a judge decide.

Justice starts with evidence—and evidence wins cases.